Adobe captivate 2017 vs articulate 360 free -
Looking for:
Adobe captivate 2017 vs articulate 360 free. Adobe Captivate vs Articulate Storyline 3 vs iSpring Suite: A Feature Comparison |
Insider Review: Adobe Captivate vs Articulate - Reva Digital - Post navigation
In this guide, we are comparing Articulate Storyline and Adobe Captivate We hope that the information provided here will highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each tool, and will enable our readers to make an informed decision when selecting the eLearning authoring software for custom eLearning development. Scroll down to start comparing the two authoring tools or click the link to jump to the section of your interest:.
So far, Articulate Storyline is only a winner when it comes to importing PowerPoint content. And Adobe Captivate scores higher with virtual reality, responsive content, and Adobe Photoshop import. Both authoring tools work equally well with Cluelabs widgets and software simulations and generally support modern eLearning trends. Here are some questions that can help you decide which tool will better meet your needs:.
The interface in Storyline is cleaner and easier to use intuitively. The user interface in Captivate is less convenient and takes a bit longer to get used to, but overall, once you learn it, you will have no issues working with it. If you are planning to create custom interactions, Storyline might be a better option for you. If you, however, are more interested in out-of-the-box functionality, you may like Captivate.
Both tools will allow you to program custom interactions, interactive elements, complex scenarios, etc. While Captivate provides more preview options, Storyline wins with output options, which can often be a deal-breaker. In addition, careful placement and alignment of slide objects take less time and effort in Storyline. If you are trying to decide which tool is right for you, it will be helpful to take a look at the list of features provided in this guide and take note of how each authoring tools scores on the features that are important to you and are key in the project you are working on.
Articulate Storyline is better when it comes to importing PowerPoint content. Both Articulate Storyline and Adobe Captivate can each offer unique features not provided by the other tool. Just by looking at the scoring provided in this article, you can see that Articulate Storyline is a superior product to Adobe Captivate.
Storyline offers more flexibility and easier workflow. However, Adobe Captivate does have a few unique features that may be important for your project. We strongly prefer to use Articulate Storyline due to its easy-to-use interface and modern eLearning development tools it offers.
Adobe Captivate also has its own strengths, but because of poor performance, outdated interface, and low productivity, it lags behind Storyline. Skip to content Storyline vs.
Adobe Captivate allows creating basic virtual reality eLearning projects. Storyline will allow you to select dimensions, video and audio quality, and other options. You have the ability to publish the eLearning project as a video in the MP4 format.
The presets and publishing settings will allow you to set the output quality. Responsive content While the player itself is responsive and adjusts based on the screen size, the eLearning content, however, always looks the same no matter the device.
Responsive eLearning projects are supported and work well with different types of devices, content can adjust based on the screen size. Software simulation Storyline provides a set of tools to record, edit, and display software simulations. Software simulations are supported in Captivate equally well. PowerPoint import Users have the ability to import slides from a PowerPoint presentation. Prior to importing, Storyline will display a two-dimensional grid showing all slides in the presentation to help the user select only those slides that are needed.
Slide content is converted into Storyline objects text boxes, shapes, etc. This means that content cannot be edited directly in Captivate, any edits have to go through PowerPoint, which adds extra steps to the process and makes the development process less convenient. Adobe Photoshop import There are currently no options to import assets directly from Adobe Photoshop. The assets can be imported from Photoshop. Upon import, they are laid out on the screen as they were positioned in the Photoshop file, saving time on content positioning and alignment.
Furthermore, the edits you make later in Photoshop can propagate directly to Captivate, saving you time and effort. Here are some questions that can help you decide which tool will better meet your needs: Will I need to import PowerPoint content into my eLearning course? Do I plan to create virtual reality-based training programs, are my learners and organization ready for this type of content?
If I need virtual reality compatibility, will I be satisfied with a limited set of VR features? Will my learners access eLearning from mobile devices as well as desktops? If I expect the learners to use mobile devices for learning, will they do this often enough to justify the longer time needed to create responsive learning projects? Will I design slides in Photoshop prior to creating the learning course?
If so, how important is it to be able to import designs directly into the authoring tools? Minimal use of pop-up windows. Menus and buttons are clearly captioned. Working with objects can get confusing because of over-reliance on the Properties panel. Software responsiveness The application responds well to user requests and features minimal lag and wait time when an operation is initiated.
It often takes a few seconds to render a new element, paste an object, etc. During this time the application freezes until the action is completed. Multiple projects handling Multiple projects can be open at the same time. However, each project opens in its own application window. Multiple projects are shown as tabs of the same application similar to other Adobe software you may have used in the past. Workspace customization Panels can be resized and moved around, but cannot be completely hidden.
The user can hide the panels, but cannot move them around the workspace. Tooltips Hovering the mouse pointer over buttons and options brings up helpful tooltips. No tooltips in the properties panel where the most confusion usually occurs.
Workspace zoom Allows to zoom in, zoom out, fit slide to window size. Zooming in and out can only be done by selecting pre-defined zoom percentages. Allows to fit slide to window size. Branching view Slides are arranged according to branching logic in both the story view and the slide view. To see the branching sequence, the user needs to open a menu, select an option, which will open a new window. This makes the workflow involving triggers smart and intuitive. Because the user can work on both the slide objects and the triggers at the same time, the development process becomes easy and intuitive.
In order to define advanced actions, the user has to open another panel. This panel not only blocks the slide, but also makes it impossible to interact with the objects on the slide until the advanced action is saved and the window is closed.
Summary: User Experience Storyline points, Captivate points The interface in Storyline is cleaner and easier to use intuitively. Here are some questions that can help you decide which tool will better meet your needs: Do I have time for the learning curve to occur or do I need to jump right into the authoring tool and start developing?
Will I be able to create effective eLearning courses using a less convenient interface? Is my computer powerful enough to work without lag and freezing when performing operations? Is it important to see branching logic at all times while designing the course? Will I use triggers or advanced actions, and if so, how important is it to be able to work in an intuitive interface? The Assets feature offers a large variety of templates that can be used. Icons A great selection of icons that can be used in the course.
Icons can be edited directly on the slides by ungrouping the shapes. A limited selection of icons, many searches return 0 results.
Icons can only be edited through Adobe Illustrator. Text captions Text captions can be used as shapes and converted to shapes, their properties can be changed in the Format pop-up window. You can style a text caption, but the options a limited to mostly cheesy outdated presets. Rollover interactions Can be achieved by using triggers, states, layers.
Native functionality for rollover interactions, no coding required. Interactive videos Can be achieved by using branching, triggers, layers. Out-of-the-box interactive video functionality provided. SVG images can be used. Input controls Several kinds of input controls can be added to the slide. Only text entry input object can be added. Miscellaneous objects Support for sliders, dials, markers, scrolling panels. No significant objects that are unique to Captivate.
Slide layers Slide layers can be used on all slides. No slide layer functionality. Drag and drops Good drag and drop functionality that could be extended with triggers. Basic drag and drop functionality. Question slides Questions slides are flexible and can be extended with triggers.
There is a little wiggle room when it comes to customizing how question slides work. Freeform interactions Several freeform interactions are supported. Some functionality can be achieved with the use of actions. Animations Animations are limited to 16 options.
Comments
Post a Comment